Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:39

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Your Camper’s Water Tank Could Be Carrying Serious Diseases, Here’s How To Fix It - The Autopian
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Saints minicamp Day 1: QB battle still in full force - NewOrleans.Football
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are the latest trends in artificial intelligence for 2024?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What was your first experience like with a black man?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
4 ways the Desmond Bane trade could affect the Celtics - Boston.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.